OpenOnco
UA EN

Onco Wiki / Red flag

IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) intermediate or poor risk score i...

Deterministic view of the source YAML entity. Clinical authority remains with the cited source IDs and reviewer sign-off state.

IDRF-RCC-IMDC-INTERMEDIATE-POOR-RISK
TypeRed flag
Statusreviewed 2026-04-29 | pending_clinical_signoff
DiseasesDIS-RCC
SourcesSRC-ESMO-RCC-2024 SRC-NCCN-KIDNEY-2025

Red Flag Origin

DefinitionIMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) intermediate or poor risk score in metastatic clear-cell RCC (Heng JCO 2009). Six adverse factors: KPS <80%, time from diagnosis to systemic therapy <1 year, hemoglobin < lower-limit-of-normal (≈12 g/dL), corrected calcium > ULN, neutrophils > ULN, platelets > ULN. 0 factors = favorable; 1-2 = intermediate; ≥3 = poor. CheckMate-214 (Motzer NEJM 2018) established superiority of nivolumab + ipilimumab over sunitinib for intermediate and poor-risk subgroups (mOS 47 vs 26 mo, ITT). KEYNOTE-426 (pembro+axi) benefits across all risk groups; nivo+ipi preferred in int/poor by long-term durable-response signal. Routes ALGO-RCC-METASTATIC-1L step 1 to IND-RCC-METASTATIC-1L-NIVO-IPI; favorable risk falls through to default IND-RCC-METASTATIC-1L-PEMBRO-AXI.
Clinical directionintensify
Categoryrisk-score
Shifts algorithmALGO-RCC-METASTATIC-1L

Trigger Logic

{
  "any_of": [
    {
      "finding": "imdc_risk",
      "value": "intermediate"
    },
    {
      "finding": "imdc_risk",
      "value": "poor"
    },
    {
      "finding": "imdc_risk",
      "value": "int"
    },
    {
      "finding": "imdc_risk_score",
      "value": "intermediate"
    },
    {
      "finding": "imdc_risk_score",
      "value": "poor"
    },
    {
      "finding": "imdc_risk_score",
      "value": "int"
    },
    {
      "comparator": ">=",
      "finding": "imdc_risk_factors_count",
      "threshold": 1
    }
  ],
  "type": "risk_score"
}

Notes

Trigger fires on the categorical `imdc_risk` field (favorable / intermediate / poor) when present, or as a fall-back on `imdc_risk_factors_count >= 1` (any IMDC adverse factor). Aggregate computation from raw inputs (KPS, hemoglobin, calcium, neutrophils, platelets, time-to-tx) is left to upstream questionnaire scoring; this RF consumes the already-derived risk category. Conflict-resolution: if RF-RCC-FRAILTY-AGE fires alongside (de-escalate), frailty wins by direction-precedence (de-escalate > intensify? — note: actually intensify > de-escalate in current matrix, so this RF would dominate; reviewers may prefer to add explicit frail-disqualifies-IO logic at algorithm level rather than reordering severity matrix). Brief authoring for W5c chunk 2026-04-30; engine smoke covered by patient_rcc_imdc_int_nivo_ipi.json (intermediate, expects nivo+ipi) and patient_rcc_imdc_fav_axi_pembro.json (favorable, expects pembro+axi).

Used By

Algorithms