Ifosfamide contraindicated or high-risk in relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma 2L salvag...
Детермінований перегляд YAML-сутності з джерельної бази. Клінічний авторитет лишається за вказаними source ID та статусом клінічного sign-off.
| ID | RF-BURKITT-IFOS-CONTRAINDICATED |
|---|---|
| Тип | Тривожна ознака |
| Статус | переглянуто 2026-05-08 |
| Хвороби | DIS-BURKITT |
| Джерела | SRC-ESMO-BURKITT-2024 SRC-NCCN-BCELL-2025 |
Походження тривожної ознаки
| Визначення | Ifosfamide contraindicated or high-risk in relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma 2L salvage, routing to R-DHAP (cisplatin-based) over R-ICE (ifosfamide-based). Three clinical scenarios: (1) Prior hemorrhagic cystitis — any prior ifosfamide- or cyclophosphamide-related hemorrhagic cystitis is a contraindication to further ifosfamide even with mesna; residual mucosal damage increases bleeding risk; (2) Pelvic RT field overlap — prior irradiation to bladder field dramatically increases ifosfamide-related bladder toxicity; avoid; (3) Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy grade ≥2 — ifosfamide causes both peripheral and central neuropathy; additional neurotoxicity risk unacceptable when baseline neuropathy already impairs function; (4) Bladder outlet obstruction, single kidney, or other bladder structural contraindication to mesna- protected ifosfamide. In these scenarios R-DHAP (dexamethasone 4... |
|---|---|
| Клінічний напрям | de-escalate |
| Категорія | fitness-eligibility |
| Змінює алгоритм | ALGO-BURKITT-2L |
Логіка спрацьовування
{
"any_of": [
{
"finding": "prior_hemorrhagic_cystitis",
"value": true
},
{
"finding": "hemorrhagic_cystitis_history",
"value": true
},
{
"finding": "ifosfamide_contraindicated",
"value": true
},
{
"finding": "pelvic_rt_bladder_field",
"value": true
},
{
"finding": "prior_pelvic_radiotherapy",
"value": true
},
{
"comparator": ">=",
"finding": "peripheral_neuropathy_grade",
"threshold": 2
},
{
"comparator": ">=",
"finding": "neuropathy_grade",
"threshold": 2
},
{
"finding": "baseline_neuropathy",
"value": "grade2"
},
{
"finding": "baseline_neuropathy",
"value": "grade3"
},
{
"finding": "bladder_dysfunction",
"value": true
},
{
"finding": "bladder_outlet_obstruction",
"value": true
},
{
"finding": "single_kidney",
"value": true
}
],
"type": "treatment_contraindication"
}
Нотатки
Step 2 handles the reverse routing: CrCl <50 mL/min / hearing loss / prior cisplatin toxicity → R-ICE preferred (uses carboplatin AUC-dose). Step 3 (this RF) handles the inverse: ifosfamide-specific contraindications → R-DHAP preferred. Both steps reference RF-BURKITT-ORGAN-DYSFUNCTION (which already fires on renal/hepatic dysfunction) — this RF captures the ifosfamide-specific history and neuropathy sub-criteria not covered by the organ-dysfunction RF. Step 1 pre-screens for transplant-ineligible patients (frailty + organ dysfunction + infection); this RF only fires after step 1 is negative (patient IS eligible for salvage). CORAL trial note: R-ICE and R-DHAP showed similar overall salvage rates (~63% ORR); the choice is driven purely by toxicity avoidance. Draft pending two-reviewer clinical co-lead signoff (CHARTER §6.1).
Де використовується
Algorithms
ALGO-BURKITT-2L- ALGO-BURKITT-2L